ALFM Global Multi-Asset Income Fund (ALFM GMIF)
This is a mutual fund that has just been opened by ALFM. It is a mutual fund that pays dividends with an annual yield of 4% to 5% and distributed to investors in a monthly basis. It is fitted mostly for investors looking for consistent cash flow without risking capital long-term growth (that's what they said). We can avail of this via GInvest as well.
ALFM GMIF's fund manager is Blackrock, one of those well-known investment providers globally. To make it short, ALFM GMIF and Blackrock GMIF are the same and the difference is that the ALFM GMIF NAV (net asset value) price is adjusted within the Philippine setting. The movement of the price of both funds will be the same. This implies that we can use Blackrock GMIF historical chart as a way to evaluate the past performance of ALFM GMIF even though ALFM GMIF's inception date was only June 2021.
Unfortunately, the historical chart shows on average that there was minimal to no capital growth for the past 10 years. The NAV price is currently on a downward trend depreciating the capital of current and previous shareholders. The dividend income had no growth as well but at least it remained stable. Technically speaking, investors lost a value of their money if they did not re-invest the dividends since inflation has been increasing year-on-year. One would question what is going on with this fund.
The top holding asset of this fund is the iShares High Yield Corporate Bond ETF which has a ticker symbol of HYG. The historical price chart of HYG is closely followed by Blackrock GMIF. Moreover, HYG gives monthly dividends with a yield of 4% to 5% as well. This is mainly the reason why ALFM and Blackrock GMIF can give monthly dividends of the same range to shareholders. The other holdings consist of other bonds from emerging markets and some value stocks. To summarize, ALFM GMIF consists of 70% bonds and 30% equities (approximately).
If we're in it for the dividends anyway and the equities it holds in the portfolio are not performing well, then one would question why not just go directly invest in HYG instead. If we invest in HYG via GoTrade for example, our dividends are taxed at 25% and HYG has an expense ratio of 0.45%. However, we get to retain most of the 4% to 5% dividend yield if we invest through ALFM GMIF. The downside is that there's a 1% management and advisory fee for every fund we invest. The 30% equities in the fund are there to supposedly protect the NAV from depreciation and ideally should increase the NAV in the long run to offset increasing inflation rate. It is recommended to hold mutual funds for at least 5 years. This recommendation is by no means at random and is usually a rule of thumb because statistically, gains materialize or if not then losses are at a minimum after 5 years.
If we put things into perspective, we can probably say that ALFM GMIF is an HYG (a bond ETF). Investors are mostly investing in a basket of company debts in the form of fixed-income bonds. Investing in individual bonds is hard to come by and difficult to liquidate. HYG solves these problems in which it will distribute the investor funds to at least 1,000 high-yield bonds worldwide. The problem however is that more than 60% of these bonds are rated as B, C, and D. These are the kind of bonds that carries a higher risk of default (they're also known as Junk Bonds). Once a bond goes default, this lowers the value of HYG and eventually reflects it to ALFM GMIF depreciating the NAV. Most of the time, high-yield bonds equate to higher risk.
With at least 1,000 bonds on its portfolio, one might look at HYG's bonds as extremely diversified so the risks of default are mitigated. However, 80% of these bonds are from the US alone. This implies that the performance of HYG (which eventually reflects in ALFM GMIF) will rely on whatever is happening in the US. The value of a bond is usually pegged to the inflation rate and the yield. If the yield of the bond is lower than the inflation rate, then it carries a lower value because it is not making money. In this case, for investors that invests on bonds individually, it is difficult to sell for no one likes buying low-value bonds. However, investing through a bond ETF like HYG is not a problem because we can always sell the shares even if at a loss. Currently, the value of ALFM/Blackrock GMIF and HYG are all in a downtrend because the inflation rate in the US has gone up to at least 7% which is higher than the 4% to 5% dividend yield. To make matters worse, the US is hiking the interest rate which is the new baseline for new yields of newly offered bonds. This implies that the value of bonds that HYG currently and previously holds are now of lower value. HYG would be able to offset this by adding more newly offered bonds of higher yield to the ETF but many businesses are reluctant to offer new bonds because of high-interest rates.
With those said, buying ALFM GMIF might look bad because many odds are going against it. The good thing however is that lower NAV price means higher dividend yield. The dividend income remains consistent and stable as it was reported that the default rate of bonds remains low. Nevertheless, a US citizen might not find it attractive because of the 7% inflation rate in their country. However it might still be a good deal for dividend-seeking Filipino investors because the Philippines is averaging at a 4% inflation rate. It is true that we have alternative dividend-income assets that gives higher yield in the Philippines but ALFM GMIF is unique on its own right most especially in the exposure of bonds that are diversified globally, the liquidity of these bonds, and the monthly dividend payout. It would probably be a good addition to a dividend income portfolio such that when added, the risks are not concentrated locally in the Philippine market only.
DDMPR
DDMPR is the only REIT that hasn't declared yet its first quarterly dividend for this year. A week ago, DDMPR disclosed that their parent DD is re-allocating the proceeds from the IPO to whatever and wherever deemed appropriate. It didn't matter before because DDMPR won't benefit anyway on any of those projects. However, one thing that caught some investors' attention is that DD will invest some of those proceeds to Ascott DD Meridian Park. It was surprising because Ascott will be infused to DDMPR later on as promised by Injap along with Double Dragon Tower. Ascott is expected to be completed in the year 2023. DDMPR investors felt delighted that some of their funds are for the growth of the company they invested in. Meanwhile, DD has been brandishing the opening of Double Dragon Tower a week or 2 ago. However, there are no updates yet of its infusion to DDMPR.
RCR
It was reported that there are 4 to 6 companies PEZA-Accredited BPOs that are willing to forego tax perks so that their employees can work from home (WFH). These companies admitted that losing employees yield more damage than the benefit of the tax perks. The stance of the Fiscal Incentives Review Board (FIRB) has not changed. They are not against WFH but the tax perks won't change and will only apply to PEZA-Accredited BPOs.
PEZA reported a year ago that 1,273 IT-BPO companies are registered with PEZA. With only up to 6 companies and not even sure if they're IT-BPOs shows that it might not be enough to give FIRB to change their mind.
This insight is not intended for RCR alone but generally for REITs who have BPO tenants. It just happens that RCR is concentrated on BPO in the IT sector which eats a bulk of the PEZA accreditation so they're the ones going to be mainly affected if the trade for tax perks for WFH trend continues.
CREIT, MER
The competition for offering renewable energy to companies is on the move. The benefits of companies going solar save them a significant amount of money.
A month ago MER made a deal with Ajinomoto Philippines Corp (APC) and a week ago they were tapped by WLCON for solar rooftop installation.
Meanwhile, CREC, the mother company of CREIT made a deal with Toyota in Cebu to supply renewable energy. CREIT is not directly related to the deal but because special dividends of CREIT will come from excess solar power energy sales then they would benefit as well from this kind of deal.
SGP
Despite the expense and difficulty of restoring power in places in the Visayas area, it was surprising that SGP was still able to give dividends which increased by 10% from a quarter ago. SGP stock price continued to drop in price reaching below FOO price due to the negative sentiment and uncertainty of the dividends. Many investors hold SGP for the dividends since this is not a growth company in which the opportunity to increase earnings is slim. If SGP's dividend yield goes down and becomes lower than the inflation rate then it's sometimes not worth holding in relative to the risk even how fundamentally defensive the business is.
Nevertheless, SGP declared dividends a week ago and the stock price immediately recovered due to the above-average dividend yield that beats the inflation rate. Given such a scenario, we can probably tell at this point that it is the dividend income that is driving the stock price of SGP. This implies that if we want capital appreciation, SGP has to increase the dividend income that beats the inflation rate. Anyhow, there is still room for SGP stock price to grow because many analysts see its current price as undervalued relative to the earnings and assets.
GMA7
GMA7 declared an annual dividend of 1.45 PHP/sh a week ago which is a 7% increase from the dividend declared a year ago. Some investors were disappointed because it has been hyped in social media that the dividend would be reaching at least a 2 PHP/sh. Nevertheless, at the current price of 15.90 PHP/sh, it still gives a 9.12% yield which is rare to come by.
The question now is whether buying GMA7 now is a good deal or not due to some factors:
(1) There is a high probability that the dividend income will not sustain. A big factor why GMA7 is giving high dividends is because they are earning a lot from monopolizing the broadcasting industry combined with the upcoming election in which their services are mainly sought by politicians for advertising. After the election, we should expect earnings to subside. Whoever is the next president would probably give favors to another broadcasting industry that will challenge the monopoly. The market share will be divided and we should expect that income of GMA7 will be affected as well.
(2) Fundamentally, many analysts see the current price as overvalued relative to potential growth, earnings, and assets. Analysts see the fair value below 15 PHP/sh and recommend a margin of safety to buy below the fair value of at least 10% or lower.
(3) Technical shows that the current price is close to the all-time high. It's never been a good idea to buy at the top only to find out later on that the price will drop in the future because of the uncertainty of the business and dividend income. Buying the stock right now mainly because of the 9% dividend yield and planning to hold it long-term might not be a good idea. When risk factor number 1 (discussed above) materializes, we don't know when will the stock price go higher than the price we bought. Maybe on the next election season again which we won't see for the next few years or probably when GMA7 finds ways to increase their earnings and assets. The point is, it's all speculative so better to buy at a margin of safety if there are too many uncertainties.
SGP, MER, DMC, SCC, AP, SPC
The hot dry season is here and the demand for power in Luzon has breached but within the range of pre-pandemic. Daily, the demand of power spikes from 10 AM to 2 PM in which the sun is at the high and many of the population will require power for their cooling appliances. The heat index for the year is averaging at least 40 degrees celsius which is dangerously hazardous and the highest recorded index is 53 degrees celsius (extremely dangerous) in Dagupan City.
Power demand is high and it's has not yet breached the supply however the supply margin is running thin. This implies that energy companies are working hard to meet the demand and expects energy sales to be high. This might seem like good profit but the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) has secondary price cap in place. This is imposed to mitigate high prices and protect the welfare of consumers. Energy companies however are petitioning to temporarily lift the secondary price cap because of soaring global oil prices which is a commodity they need to run the plants. With high oil prices combined with the secondary price cap, their concern is whether they can still make good profit margins. SGP however is not entirely affected from such since it profits only for transmitting energy produced by these energy producing companies.