TEL
A week ago TEL finally signed the sale of 5,907 of its tower for 77 billion PHP. They are also going to lease those towers back and those towers will be shared by other telcos as well. The plan of selling their tower is not new. They've been thinking about it ever since the government pushed the "common tower policy" a year ago. They cannot monopolize their tower so it makes sense to sell and lease it back because it is more economical. They're at a disadvantage if they will be doing the maintenance and yet the tower is being shared by their competitors. A year ago they however planned to sell 11,000 or 50% of their towers. Only 25% has been sold so far so this means that they have more towers to dispose of in the future. They plan to use the proceeds to strengthen their balance sheet by repaying debts. With the recent sale, they disclosed that 9 billion PHP of the proceeds will be used as special dividends.
Meanwhile, TEL's e-wallet and digital bank Maya (formerly Paymaya) is now being rolled out. The digital bank offers high yield savings account regulated by BSP. Fintech Voyager, the subsidiary and developer of Maya was able to raise 210 million USD to become the 2nd Philippine 'Unicorn'. This is something to keep an eye on and we'll soon see how much revenue it will add up to TEL. GCash, the 1st Philippine 'Unicorn' had its hyped-up valuation days too but sadly it's not a significant contributing factor to GLO's overall net income.
PLC
The much-awaited dividend has been finally declared. PLC declared a 0.05 PHP/sh which is higher than the 0.04 PHP/sh a year ago. Those who have bought PLC shares at the 0.4 PHP/sh or below will benefit with a dividend yield of at least 10%.
The future prospects of casinos however are still uncertain. The Philippine casino gaming revenue has increased to 97 billion PHP in the year 2021 from the low of 81 billion PHP in the year 2020. Revenues are still far away from the pre-pandemic level of at least 150 billion PHP. 82% of this revenue are casinos that are located in Entertainment City in which PLC's City of Dreams Manila is located.
PLC did well this 2021 in which they ended with a net income of 1.1 billion PHP from a low of 324 million PHP in the year 2020. However, the net income is still far away from the usual pre-pandemic level of at least 2 billion PHP. The reason why PLC did well is due to lower quarantine alert levels which allowed the casinos to operate. Moreover, they bagged a 5-year contract from PCSO to operate the lotto business which improved their sales.
PLC still remains an attractive stock for dividend play since they give out at least 80% of the unrestricted retained earnings as dividends. The high dividend payout is backed by healthy finances and strong cash flow. They have no debt, no capital expenditure requirements, and no significant lease or interest payments. They do not share operating losses in City of Dreams Manila and they earn only through gaming revenues.
The sustainability of the dividend income however is uncertain since earnings have not reached the pre-pandemic levels. COVID is still here and new variants were detected. There is uncertainty if quarantine alert level 1 is going to be common which allows casinos to operate. COVID news is being overshadowed by the election at the moment and we don't know what's going to happen after. PLC released its first-quarter report and they have already made a net income of 298 million PHP. Note however that their annual net income in the year 2020 was only 324 million PHP and yet they were able to pay out dividends. We have 3 more quarters to go for 2022 and PLC is close to going beyond the 324 million PHP net income. We have to keep an eye on the earnings for the next few quarters. The closer the annual income reaches 1.1 billion PHP then the higher the probability of sustained dividends.
PLC's management made it clear in their annual stockholder meeting a week ago that they will continue to payout dividends and enhance shareholder value. Such statement brings the hype but it's not a good idea to buy now and chase the high dividend yield because it is being played by traders. PLC pays annual dividends anyway so there's no rush to buy. It's best to wait for ex-date for share price to drop and consolidate. Until then we need to track the earnings on a quarterly basis before entering.
MREIT
MREIT declared its first quarterly dividends 2 weeks ago. It amounted to 0.2430 PHP/sh, up from a low of 0.2399 PHP/sh a quarter ago. It hasn't reached yet the projected dividend of 1 PHP/sh for the year 2022. The management however emphasized that the dividend income does not reflect yet the assets that were infused and are to be infused for the remaining of this year. The management so far is consistent and is able to deliver its forward-looking statements.
RCR
RCR on the other hand has finally closed the deal on acquiring 2 assets which they reported last March. These 2 assets have a combined gross leasable space of 44,000 square meters. They projected a dividend yield of 6.06% for the year 2022 which is higher than the 5.96% they reported nearly a month ago. These projections are based on the IPO price of 6.45 PHP/sh.
RCR made a forward-looking statement before that they will be infusing 442,000 square meters worth of assets. After acquiring the said 2 assets earlier, RCR now has approximately around 398,000 square meters left to infuse. However, there are no new disclosures on when the next infusion is going to take place. COL analysts made a projection that RCR will be paying as much as 0.42 PHP/sh as annual dividends by 2023.
AREIT
AREIT's share price has been dropping lately reaching 39 PHP/sh. We do know that ALI made a property-for-share swap with AREIT at 44.65 PHP/sh. ALI however sold these shares at 39.70 PHP/sh to some institutional investor. ALI will be using the proceeds for some joint venture project with LTG's real estate arm. ALI traded its properties to AREIT to raise cash. Nobody knows the reason why ALI sold the shares at a discount to institutional investors but such actions might affected market sentiment which is why AREIT is now trading at 39 PHP/sh. Retail investors probably thought that 39 PHP is the fair market value.
Is this something to be worried about? For a long-term dividend investor, probably not. The fundamentals of AREIT is still intact. AREIT at 39 PHP/sh is in fact still expensive for some investors because it is still trading above the net asset value of 32 PHP/sh. It is however rare for AREIT to trade below the net asset value so some already see any price below 39 PHP/sh a bargain. The dividend yield of AREIT at 39 PHP/sh is still not as high as other REITs however COL analysts made a projection that AREIT will be paying as much as 2.21 PHP/sh by 2023. That rate equates to an annual dividend yield of 5.67%. With fundamentals intact, resiliency of business in the COVID era, and an attractive forward-looking dividend are good cushions to buy AREIT speculatively if rooting for short to medium-term capital appreciation.
Omar Cruz, AREIT's lead independent director, bought additional AREIT shares at 41 PHP/sh. An insider buying shares from the company it is working for boosts investor confidence. I've been tracking all of Omar's trading activities on AREIT and so far he hasn't sold any shares and has accumulated at least 410,000 AREIT shares at an average cost of 32 PHP/sh.
DDMPR
DDMPR is the only REIT that has not declared its last tranche of dividends for the year 2021. Is this something to be worried about? Well, probably not if we are still in it for the dividends. The REIT law requires them to pay out dividends anyway. Some investors have already unloaded their shares for the following reasons:
(1) The management is not transparent to their investors. Many investors held to Injap's statement in the IPO that they intended to pay out dividends quarterly. Some investors attempted to call the investor relations of DDMPR with regards to the dividend and unfortunately they do not know as well. Nobody knows what's going on but for sure it is increasing fear, doubt, and uncertainty among investors. DDMPR remains silent and the negative speculations are growing. With doubt and uncertainty going on, investors are selling at a loss to protect their capital. Some investors are not planning to buy back DDMPR shares even if it goes to an attractive level and that is because of inferior investor relation management.
(2) Still no infusion insight. Ascott DD Meridian Park and Double Dragon tower were projected to be completed this year. Double Dragon tower has been completed but no disclosures about it yet. Ascott DD Meridian Park is now projected to be completed in 2023. The REIT law however mentioned that an asset has to be operating for at least 3 years before being infused into a REIT. If true, then we'll have to wait until 2025.
(3) Their buildings are still not PEZA accredited. Their tenants are high risk because the majority of them are gaming-related BPOs and POGOs. They do not seem not to last long as long-term tenants which eventually affect DDMPR's occupancy rate and dividend yield.
On the other hand, here are a few positive notes on why some investors are holding and continue to buy DDMPR shares:
(1) DDMPR is located in a premium location. There will always be a business in the bay area. DDMPR might look bad now but business is a cycle. Real estate is a somewhat resilient asset anyway. They probably will have PEZA accreditation in the future with better tenants. Investors are fine leaving cash they do not need and be fine with the dividends.
(2) It's still the only REIT where the land is included. This entitles investors to benefit from the increase of the land property value.
(3) DDMPR has no debt. DDMPR is trading below the NAV (net asset value) of 2 PHP/sh.
SPC, AP
For the first time in 5 years, SPC had an annual EPS (earnings per share) of below 1 PHP. They ended up with an EPS of 0.80 PHP for the year 2021 down by 11% from a year ago. The drop in earnings is due to the suspension of WESM (Wholesale Electricity Spot Market) in the Visayas region. WESM was suspended last December 2021 because of Typhoon Odette thus SPC was not able to sell its output. WESM partially resumed on January 17 but the rest on February 10 of 2022. SPC shares the same sentiment as to why AP was down as well since both of these energy companies have significant operations in the Visayas region.
With that said, there is this uncertainty of dividend payout. AP for sure will most probably continue paying out dividends since they are committed to a dividend policy of paying at most 50% of their earnings to shareholders. SPC on the other hand has no such dividend policy and investors rely only on past dividend payouts.
I can only think of 2 cases by how much SPC will give out as dividends:
(1) SPC has a 5-year average dividend payout ratio of 70%. This implies that we should expect SPC to pay out 0.56 PHP/sh as dividends if we are to get 70% of the EPS. SPC is known to pay out dividends twice a year so we can conservatively say the first tranche of at least 0.28 PHP/sh dividend payout which is lower than the usual 0.40 PHP/sh SPC regularly gives. We can also estimate dividends by adjusting the 70% payout ratio. Based a 5-year historical data, SPC can have a dividend payout ratio of as high as 95% and as low as 50%.
(2) Dividends are taken from unrestricted retained earnings. For the year 2021, they had an unrestricted retained earning of 5.6 billion PHP which is lower than the 7.1 billion PHP in 2020. Last 2019 SPC had an unrestricted retained earning of 5.9 billion PHP and they were able to give the first tranche of 0.40 PHP/sh as dividends.
The issue however is that SPC had released 3 tranches of dividends in 2021 and they have spent a significant amount to acquire assets from STEAG (a coal company in Mindanao) and power barges from ACEN. That said, we do not exactly know how much SPC will pay as dividends or if they will give out dividends. Anyhow, there will be an annual stockholder meeting on the 31st of May and we'll have to keep an eye on the results and if dividends will be discussed.
Even though SPC made lower earnings, this does not imply that they are in trouble. They are still strapped with cash, with minimal to no debt, and the business fundamentals are still intact. Typhoons have always been a significant risk in the energy sector. Nevertheless, energy is still a much-needed commodity. They have admitted that there is no assurance yet of substantial additional source of income and they are looking for opportunities in the power and energy sector. Their planned exploration to renewable energy sector is still waiting for SEC approval.
NIKL
The PH is asking the US to consider our country as a partner in supplying nickel and cobalt resources. The PH is abundant in the said minerals that are often used in the production of tech products. In response, 2 US firms are looking to tap local nickel companies for supply. These 2 US firms are into energy and battery systems.
There is no further information yet with regards yet who those local nickel companies are but tagging NIKL to this discussion because it is the top nickel producer in the country and number 2 globally.
DMC
DMC's construction arm partnered with Northern Star Energy Corporation to build the 3rd largest import facility which when completed will be leased to Shell Petroleum. The expected completion date will be in 2024.
On the other hand, DMC's construction arm partnered also with RLC for the construction of Sonora Garden Residences, a condo in Las Pinas. This is expected to be completed by 2024 as well.
With those said, DMC bagged a contract that would give them additional income to the holding company until 2024. Hopefully, when completed, they will bag more contracts to do the maintenance as well.
MER
Meralco's solar power arm seems to gain traction. Last February, MER closed a deal with Ajinomoto Philippines Corp (APC) for the installation of solar power. Then in March, they closed a deal with WLCON for solar rooftop installation. A month ago they again closed another deal with Avon Philippines for another solar power installation.
The trend of companies adding solar to their buildings is becoming more common and MER is there to grab the opportunity. The advantage of MER over other competitors is that these companies going solar can take advantage of the Retail Competition and Open Access (RCOA) law. This allows companies to negotiate their electricity rates with their preferred suppliers. Solar as we know had been around for a long time and the reason why companies are choosing MER is probably that they are being offered a good deal on electricity rates.